Example data. This is a sample JEDI report made from made-up shift notes, not from a real plant. It was made with the JEDI browser build that is in testing. Back to JEDI

Example plant: JEDI (JEEVES Entropy Detection Intelligence) report

Generated 2026-11-10T20:08:05-05:00 · read 10 entries
0
Red
Red: erosion stopping value production at the time of the report.
3
Yellow
Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
2
Green
Green: erosion restored at the time of the report.
7
Black
Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement.

At a glance

YellowCapper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper; material handler was covering two lines.
YellowShort staffed on 1st, two call-offs, ran L-4 with one operator.
YellowCases piling up at the palletizer, WIP (work in process) queue backed up into the aisle; bottleneck at the stretch wrapper.
GreenL-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3; maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.
GreenL-4 filler fault again on station 3, third time this week; reset it and kept going.
BlackRepeated similar erosion, at least 3 times in the record: L-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3; maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.
BlackOvertime request for Saturday still waiting on approval from corporate; owner TBD for the weekend coverage.
BlackRepeated similar erosion, at least 2 times in the record: Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper; material handler was covering two lines.
BlackNew spec for torque came out Monday but 2nd shift is still running the old torque value; nobody told us.
BlackHold QH-221 on lot 4417 blanks still open, criteria unclear, 2nd shift did not hear about it.
BlackNew hire on the labeler hasn't been trained on the changeover, the lead operator showed him once; only she knows the label sequence, not written down.
BlackSanitation and production both say the CIP (clean-in-place) sign-off belongs to the other department; who owns that.

Immediate concerns (5)

Tap or click a line for the evidence, root cause, trend, owner and next action. Printing shows every item expanded.

Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report (3)

YellowCapper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper; material handler was covering two lines.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N002)
    “Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper. Material handler was covering two lines.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes do not mark a verified root cause.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
Work isn't moving cleanly between steps in this area. The area supervisor can rebalance material, people and sequence this shift.
Next action: Open one root-cause ticket for the repeat issue with a single owner.
Source of erosion: Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
Rating: Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report. This line shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
Where: shift handoff (item Y1)
YellowCapper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper; material handler was covering two lines.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N002)
    “Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper. Material handler was covering two lines.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes do not mark a verified root cause.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
Work isn't moving cleanly between steps in this area. The area supervisor can rebalance material, people and sequence this shift.
Next action: Open one root-cause ticket for the repeat issue with a single owner.
Source of erosion: Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
Rating: Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report. This line shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
Where: shift handoff (item Y1)
YellowShort staffed on 1st, two call-offs, ran L-4 with one operator.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N010)
    “Short staffed on 1st, two call-offs, ran L-4 with one operator.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes do not mark a verified root cause.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
The people at the step may not have the staffing, training or support to do it right. The supervisor checks whether they're equipped and empowered.
Next action: Check on this at the next handoff before it turns red.
Source of erosion: People (also touches Flow)
The person at the step lacks the skill, standard work, staffing or support to do it right. Never blame; it asks whether they're equipped and empowered.
Rating: Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report. This line shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
Where: L-4 (item Y2)
YellowShort staffed on 1st, two call-offs, ran L-4 with one operator.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N010)
    “Short staffed on 1st, two call-offs, ran L-4 with one operator.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes do not mark a verified root cause.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
The people at the step may not have the staffing, training or support to do it right. The supervisor checks whether they're equipped and empowered.
Next action: Check on this at the next handoff before it turns red.
Source of erosion: People (also touches Flow)
The person at the step lacks the skill, standard work, staffing or support to do it right. Never blame; it asks whether they're equipped and empowered.
Rating: Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report. This line shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
Where: L-4 (item Y2)
YellowCases piling up at the palletizer, WIP (work in process) queue backed up into the aisle; bottleneck at the stretch wrapper.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N007)
    “Cases piling up at the palletizer, WIP (work in process) queue backed up into the aisle. Bottleneck at the stretch wrapper.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes do not mark a verified root cause.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
Work isn't moving cleanly between steps in this area. The area supervisor can rebalance material, people and sequence this shift.
Next action: Check on this at the next handoff before it turns red.
Source of erosion: Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
Rating: Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report. This line shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
Where: shift handoff (item Y3)
YellowCases piling up at the palletizer, WIP (work in process) queue backed up into the aisle; bottleneck at the stretch wrapper.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N007)
    “Cases piling up at the palletizer, WIP (work in process) queue backed up into the aisle. Bottleneck at the stretch wrapper.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes do not mark a verified root cause.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
Work isn't moving cleanly between steps in this area. The area supervisor can rebalance material, people and sequence this shift.
Next action: Check on this at the next handoff before it turns red.
Source of erosion: Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
Rating: Yellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report. This line shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
Where: shift handoff (item Y3)

Green: erosion restored at the time of the report (2)

GreenL-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3; maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N001)
    “L-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3. Maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Maintenance planner
The equipment is down or underperforming. The maintenance planner gets the parts, people and time scheduled to restore it.
Next action: Write down what was restored and how. Find the root cause so it stays restored; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
Rating: Green: erosion restored at the time of the report. This line shows the erosion restored at the time of the report. Root cause still to be determined.
Where: L-4 (item G1)
GreenL-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3; maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N001)
    “L-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3. Maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Maintenance planner
The equipment is down or underperforming. The maintenance planner gets the parts, people and time scheduled to restore it.
Next action: Write down what was restored and how. Find the root cause so it stays restored; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
Rating: Green: erosion restored at the time of the report. This line shows the erosion restored at the time of the report. Root cause still to be determined.
Where: L-4 (item G1)
GreenL-4 filler fault again on station 3, third time this week; reset it and kept going.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N006)
    “L-4 filler fault again on station 3, third time this week. Reset it and kept going.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Maintenance / reliability engineer
The same equipment problem keeps coming back. That needs a root cause, not another reset, and a reliability engineer or maintenance lead owns root cause.
Next action: Write down what was restored and how. Find the root cause so it stays restored; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
Rating: Green: erosion restored at the time of the report. This line shows the erosion restored at the time of the report. Root cause still to be determined.
Where: L-4 (item G2)
GreenL-4 filler fault again on station 3, third time this week; reset it and kept going.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N006)
    “L-4 filler fault again on station 3, third time this week. Reset it and kept going.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Maintenance / reliability engineer
The same equipment problem keeps coming back. That needs a root cause, not another reset, and a reliability engineer or maintenance lead owns root cause.
Next action: Write down what was restored and how. Find the root cause so it stays restored; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
Rating: Green: erosion restored at the time of the report. This line shows the erosion restored at the time of the report. Root cause still to be determined.
Where: L-4 (item G2)

Black (7)

repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement

Start here (3)

A short list to act on first: any safety concern, then quick wins, then one or two major items. Every Black item is still listed.

Quick win: a 5S (sort, set in order, shine, standardize, sustain) type action is named (“label sequence”).
BlackNew hire on the labeler hasn't been trained on the changeover, the lead operator showed him once; only she knows the label sequence, not written down.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N004)
    “New hire on the labeler hasn't been trained on the changeover, the lead operator showed him once. Only she knows the label sequence, not written down.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor (with training coordinator)
Know-how lives in one person's head. The supervisor gets it written as standard work and shared with every shift. This is about equipping people, not blame.
Next action: Get the routine written down as standard work and shared with every shift.
Source of erosion: People
The person at the step lacks the skill, standard work, staffing or support to do it right. Never blame; it asks whether they're equipped and empowered.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B6)
BlackNew hire on the labeler hasn't been trained on the changeover, the lead operator showed him once; only she knows the label sequence, not written down.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N004)
    “New hire on the labeler hasn't been trained on the changeover, the lead operator showed him once. Only she knows the label sequence, not written down.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor (with training coordinator)
Know-how lives in one person's head. The supervisor gets it written as standard work and shared with every shift. This is about equipping people, not blame.
Next action: Get the routine written down as standard work and shared with every shift.
Source of erosion: People
The person at the step lacks the skill, standard work, staffing or support to do it right. Never blame; it asks whether they're equipped and empowered.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B6)
Quick win: a fix is named (“clean-in-place) sign-off belongs to the other department”).
BlackSanitation and production both say the CIP (clean-in-place) sign-off belongs to the other department; who owns that.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N008)
    “Sanitation and production both say the CIP (clean-in-place) sign-off belongs to the other department. Who owns that?”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Plant manager (no owner named yet)
No one owns this yet, and the people involved can't assign ownership across departments themselves. The plant manager (or the manager over both areas) names one owner.
Next action: Name one role to own this, then close the gap so it stops costing value.
Source of erosion: Organization
The structure around the work causes the loss: unclear ownership, conflicting goals, approval layers, policies or incentives that pull against value.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B7)
BlackSanitation and production both say the CIP (clean-in-place) sign-off belongs to the other department; who owns that.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N008)
    “Sanitation and production both say the CIP (clean-in-place) sign-off belongs to the other department. Who owns that?”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Plant manager (no owner named yet)
No one owns this yet, and the people involved can't assign ownership across departments themselves. The plant manager (or the manager over both areas) names one owner.
Next action: Name one role to own this, then close the gap so it stops costing value.
Source of erosion: Organization
The structure around the work causes the loss: unclear ownership, conflicting goals, approval layers, policies or incentives that pull against value.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B7)
Major item: seen 3 times with downtime named. A fit for root cause analysis or a Six Sigma project.
BlackRepeated similar erosion, at least 3 times in the record: L-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3; maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N001)
    “L-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3. Maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.”
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N006)
    “L-4 filler fault again on station 3, third time this week. Reset it and kept going.”
Repeat evidence: 2 similar occurrences on the same asset in these notes; the notes say it happened again (again, third time).
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Finding and fixing it is the improvement opportunity.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Maintenance / reliability engineer
The same equipment problem keeps coming back. That needs a root cause, not another reset, and a reliability engineer or maintenance lead owns root cause.
Next action: Open one continuous improvement project with a single owner to find and remove the root cause of the repeats; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: similar erosion repeated in the record (2 similar occurrences on the same asset in these notes; the notes say it happened again (again, third time)). A continuous improvement project; each line keeps its own color.
Where: L-4 (item B1)
BlackRepeated similar erosion, at least 3 times in the record: L-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3; maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N001)
    “L-4 filler down 45 min, servo drive fault on station 3. Maint replaced the encoder cable, back running 19:20.”
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N006)
    “L-4 filler fault again on station 3, third time this week. Reset it and kept going.”
Repeat evidence: 2 similar occurrences on the same asset in these notes; the notes say it happened again (again, third time).
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Finding and fixing it is the improvement opportunity.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Maintenance / reliability engineer
The same equipment problem keeps coming back. That needs a root cause, not another reset, and a reliability engineer or maintenance lead owns root cause.
Next action: Open one continuous improvement project with a single owner to find and remove the root cause of the repeats; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: similar erosion repeated in the record (2 similar occurrences on the same asset in these notes; the notes say it happened again (again, third time)). A continuous improvement project; each line keeps its own color.
Where: L-4 (item B1)

Later (4)

Every other Black item, nothing left out.

BlackOvertime request for Saturday still waiting on approval from corporate; owner TBD for the weekend coverage.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N005)
    “Overtime request for Saturday still waiting on approval from corporate. Owner TBD for the weekend coverage.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Plant manager (no owner named yet)
No one owns this yet, and the people involved can't assign ownership across departments themselves. The plant manager (or the manager over both areas) names one owner.
Next action: Name one role to own this, then close the gap so it stops costing value.
Source of erosion: Organization (also touches People)
The structure around the work causes the loss: unclear ownership, conflicting goals, approval layers, policies or incentives that pull against value.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B2)
BlackOvertime request for Saturday still waiting on approval from corporate; owner TBD for the weekend coverage.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N005)
    “Overtime request for Saturday still waiting on approval from corporate. Owner TBD for the weekend coverage.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Plant manager (no owner named yet)
No one owns this yet, and the people involved can't assign ownership across departments themselves. The plant manager (or the manager over both areas) names one owner.
Next action: Name one role to own this, then close the gap so it stops costing value.
Source of erosion: Organization (also touches People)
The structure around the work causes the loss: unclear ownership, conflicting goals, approval layers, policies or incentives that pull against value.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B2)
BlackRepeated similar erosion, at least 2 times in the record: Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper; material handler was covering two lines.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N002)
    “Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper. Material handler was covering two lines.”
Repeat evidence: the notes say it happened again (twice).
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Finding and fixing it is the improvement opportunity.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
Work isn't moving cleanly between steps in this area. The area supervisor can rebalance material, people and sequence this shift.
Next action: Open one continuous improvement project with a single owner to find and remove the root cause of the repeats; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: similar erosion repeated in the record (the notes say it happened again (twice)). A continuous improvement project; each line keeps its own color.
Where: shift handoff (item B3)
BlackRepeated similar erosion, at least 2 times in the record: Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper; material handler was covering two lines.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N002)
    “Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper. Material handler was covering two lines.”
Repeat evidence: the notes say it happened again (twice).
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Finding and fixing it is the improvement opportunity.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Area supervisor
Work isn't moving cleanly between steps in this area. The area supervisor can rebalance material, people and sequence this shift.
Next action: Open one continuous improvement project with a single owner to find and remove the root cause of the repeats; when it is confirmed, write "Root cause verified" in the notes.
Source of erosion: Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: similar erosion repeated in the record (the notes say it happened again (twice)). A continuous improvement project; each line keeps its own color.
Where: shift handoff (item B3)
BlackNew spec for torque came out Monday but 2nd shift is still running the old torque value; nobody told us.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N003)
    “New spec for torque came out Monday but 2nd shift is still running the old torque value. Nobody told us.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Quality engineer
A quality decision or specification isn't reaching the people who need it. The quality engineer owns the criteria and makes sure every shift has them.
Next action: Name one owner to close this gap (information, training, standard or approval) and confirm it with every shift.
Source of erosion: Information (also touches Organization)
The right information doesn't reach the right person or people in a timely manner: unclear specs, holds nobody owns, handoffs lost between shifts, data that never reaches the person who could act on it.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B4)
BlackNew spec for torque came out Monday but 2nd shift is still running the old torque value; nobody told us.
Evidence from your text:
  • Wed 11/4 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N003)
    “New spec for torque came out Monday but 2nd shift is still running the old torque value. Nobody told us.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Quality engineer
A quality decision or specification isn't reaching the people who need it. The quality engineer owns the criteria and makes sure every shift has them.
Next action: Name one owner to close this gap (information, training, standard or approval) and confirm it with every shift.
Source of erosion: Information (also touches Organization)
The right information doesn't reach the right person or people in a timely manner: unclear specs, holds nobody owns, handoffs lost between shifts, data that never reaches the person who could act on it.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: shift handoff (item B4)
BlackHold QH-221 on lot 4417 blanks still open, criteria unclear, 2nd shift did not hear about it.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N009)
    “Hold QH-221 on lot 4417 blanks still open, criteria unclear, 2nd shift did not hear about it.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Quality engineer
A quality decision or specification isn't reaching the people who need it. The quality engineer owns the criteria and makes sure every shift has them.
Next action: Name one owner to close this gap (information, training, standard or approval) and confirm it with every shift.
Source of erosion: Information
The right information doesn't reach the right person or people in a timely manner: unclear specs, holds nobody owns, handoffs lost between shifts, data that never reaches the person who could act on it.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: QH-221, 4417 (item B5)
BlackHold QH-221 on lot 4417 blanks still open, criteria unclear, 2nd shift did not hear about it.
Evidence from your text:
  • Thu 11/5 · shift handoff · example-input.txt (N009)
    “Hold QH-221 on lot 4417 blanks still open, criteria unclear, 2nd shift did not hear about it.”
Root cause: Root cause still to be determined. Your notes name the gap but not why it exists.
Trend: Not enough saved runs yet to show a trend for this item (trends appear from the second saved run for the same plant or area).
Owner (suggested role): Quality engineer
A quality decision or specification isn't reaching the people who need it. The quality engineer owns the criteria and makes sure every shift has them.
Next action: Name one owner to close this gap (information, training, standard or approval) and confirm it with every shift.
Source of erosion: Information
The right information doesn't reach the right person or people in a timely manner: unclear specs, holds nobody owns, handoffs lost between shifts, data that never reaches the person who could act on it.
Rating: Black: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement: this line shows a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on.
Where: QH-221, 4417 (item B5)

Possible connections (0)

Clues across the notes that the crew may not see. Each one is a link to check, not a confirmed cause.

No possible connections in these notes yet. Plain repeats are listed as Black items.

The five sources of erosion

Each box shows the worst color found for that source.

Machine
Black
Green 2 · Black 1
Flow
Yellow
Yellow 2 · Black 1
Information
Black
Black 2
People
Yellow
Yellow 1 · Black 1
Organization
Black
Black 2

What's new

JEDI is updated and improved over time, like most tools on a factory floor.

Tell us: What do you like? What don't you like? What would you like to see?

Email your feedback to hello@manufacturingentropy.com

Your email app opens with the questions filled in. Nothing is sent from this page or this report.

More information

Summary in words

Overall: Yellow. JEDI read 10 lines and gave 10 of them a color: 0 red, 3 yellow, 2 green, 5 black. It also found 2 repeat patterns across the record, each listed as one more Black item. Most of the active erosion traces to Flow and People. Start with Y1: Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper. Material handler was covering two lines. Suggested owner: Area supervisor. 7 Black: repeated or ongoing erosion (2 repeat patterns).

Summary in words

Overall: Yellow. JEDI read 10 lines and gave 10 of them a color: 0 red, 3 yellow, 2 green, 5 black. It also found 2 repeat patterns across the record, each listed as one more Black item. Most of the active erosion traces to Flow and People. Start with Y1: Capper starved twice, caps ran out of the hopper. Material handler was covering two lines. Suggested owner: Area supervisor. 7 Black: repeated or ongoing erosion (2 repeat patterns).

What the colors mean

RedRed: erosion stopping value production at the time of the report.
JEDI rates a line Red when it shows erosion stopping value production at the time of the report: down, stopped, shut down, won't run, out of service, idle or held.
YellowYellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
JEDI rates a line Yellow when it shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report: slow, reduced speed, short staffed, starved, backed up, behind, scrap or rework.
GreenGreen: erosion restored at the time of the report.
JEDI rates a line Green when it shows the erosion restored at the time of the report, from any of the five sources (Machine, Flow, Information, People, Organization): equipment back running, material arrived, a staffing gap filled, a hold released or information received. Each restored line stays Green even when it has happened before. If the notes don't say the root cause was verified (for example "Root cause verified: worn seal"), it says "Root cause still to be determined." Restored only on assumption ("should be fine", "I think it's fixed") is not Green.
BlackBlack: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement.
JEDI rates a line Black when it shows repeated or ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated similar erosion across the record (a line says it happened again, the same asset has more than one similar occurrence in this run, or it was restored in a run saved earlier on this computer) goes under Black as one more continuous improvement item, even when each case was restored; each line keeps its own color. Ongoing erosion is a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on. A planned or avoided stop, or any other line that shows no stop, slowdown or restore, is also listed under Black so no line is left out.

What the colors mean

RedRed: erosion stopping value production at the time of the report.
JEDI rates a line Red when it shows erosion stopping value production at the time of the report: down, stopped, shut down, won't run, out of service, idle or held.
YellowYellow: erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report.
JEDI rates a line Yellow when it shows erosion slowing or limiting value production at the time of the report: slow, reduced speed, short staffed, starved, backed up, behind, scrap or rework.
GreenGreen: erosion restored at the time of the report.
JEDI rates a line Green when it shows the erosion restored at the time of the report, from any of the five sources (Machine, Flow, Information, People, Organization): equipment back running, material arrived, a staffing gap filled, a hold released or information received. Each restored line stays Green even when it has happened before. If the notes don't say the root cause was verified (for example "Root cause verified: worn seal"), it says "Root cause still to be determined." Restored only on assumption ("should be fine", "I think it's fixed") is not Green.
BlackBlack: repeated or ongoing erosion: a sign of something that needs continuous improvement.
JEDI rates a line Black when it shows repeated or ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated similar erosion across the record (a line says it happened again, the same asset has more than one similar occurrence in this run, or it was restored in a run saved earlier on this computer) goes under Black as one more continuous improvement item, even when each case was restored; each line keeps its own color. Ongoing erosion is a gap in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals while value production goes on. A planned or avoided stop, or any other line that shows no stop, slowdown or restore, is also listed under Black so no line is left out.

Counts by source

Source of value erosionRedYellowGreenBlack
Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
0021
Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
0201
Information
The right information doesn't reach the right person or people in a timely manner: unclear specs, holds nobody owns, handoffs lost between shifts, data that never reaches the person who could act on it.
0002
People
The person at the step lacks the skill, standard work, staffing or support to do it right. Never blame; it asks whether they're equipped and empowered.
0101
Organization
The structure around the work causes the loss: unclear ownership, conflicting goals, approval layers, policies or incentives that pull against value.
0002

Counts by source

Source of value erosionRedYellowGreenBlack
Machine
The equipment itself fails or underperforms: breakdowns, drift, slow cycles, tooling wear, anything keeping a station from running at standard.
0021
Flow
Work doesn't move cleanly between steps: starved or blocked stations, batching, queues, bottlenecks, material not where it's needed when it's needed.
0201
Information
The right information doesn't reach the right person or people in a timely manner: unclear specs, holds nobody owns, handoffs lost between shifts, data that never reaches the person who could act on it.
0002
People
The person at the step lacks the skill, standard work, staffing or support to do it right. Never blame; it asks whether they're equipped and empowered.
0101
Organization
The structure around the work causes the loss: unclear ownership, conflicting goals, approval layers, policies or incentives that pull against value.
0002

Trends

No earlier saved run for this plant or area on this computer yet. Trends appear from the second saved run. Trends compare this run with earlier runs saved on this computer for the same plant or area. They show only what the saved notes show. JEDI does not predict downtime or the future.

Trends

No earlier saved run for this plant or area on this computer yet. Trends appear from the second saved run. Trends compare this run with earlier runs saved on this computer for the same plant or area. They show only what the saved notes show. JEDI does not predict downtime or the future.

Terms used in your text

  • QH: quality hold
  • WIP: work in progress

Terms used in your text

  • QH: quality hold
  • WIP: work in progress

How to read this

  • Every line of your notes gets exactly one color from its own wording; a line with no stop, constraint or restore wording is Black. No line is dropped.
  • Green means the line shows the erosion restored at the time of the report, from any of the five sources, even when it has happened before; restored only on assumption is not Green. Without a verified root cause it says "Root cause still to be determined."
  • Black means repeated or ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated similar erosion goes under Black as one more item that quotes every line involved, even when each case was restored; across runs it compares only with runs saved on this computer. Gaps in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals, and any other line with no stop, slowdown or restore, are listed under Black too, so no line is left out.
  • Sources with no signals were not mentioned in the notes; that is not proof they are healthy.
  • Ratings come from wording in the notes, so check each against what you know of the floor.
  • JEDI does not predict downtime or the future; it reports only what your notes show.
  • Process, not person: owners are roles, never individuals to blame.

How to read this

  • Every line of your notes gets exactly one color from its own wording; a line with no stop, constraint or restore wording is Black. No line is dropped.
  • Green means the line shows the erosion restored at the time of the report, from any of the five sources, even when it has happened before; restored only on assumption is not Green. Without a verified root cause it says "Root cause still to be determined."
  • Black means repeated or ongoing erosion, a sign of something that needs continuous improvement. Repeated similar erosion goes under Black as one more item that quotes every line involved, even when each case was restored; across runs it compares only with runs saved on this computer. Gaps in information, training, ownership, standards or approvals, and any other line with no stop, slowdown or restore, are listed under Black too, so no line is left out.
  • Sources with no signals were not mentioned in the notes; that is not proof they are healthy.
  • Ratings come from wording in the notes, so check each against what you know of the floor.
  • JEDI does not predict downtime or the future; it reports only what your notes show.
  • Process, not person: owners are roles, never individuals to blame.